As vicissitudes do "Ensaio sobre o Dom"



Baixar 132.09 Kb.
Página3/3
Encontro02.12.2017
Tamanho132.09 Kb.
1   2   3


__ .1965[1939]. Primitive Polynesian Economy. London: Routledge & Keagan Paul. 2a edição.

__ .1967 [1970]. "Themes in Economic Anthropology. A General Comment". In: R. Firth (ed.), Themes in Economic Anthropology. London: Tavistock Publications. pp. 1-28.

__ .1975. "An Appraisal of Modern Social Anthropology". Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 4:1-25.

FOURNIER, Marcel. 1994. Marcel Mauss. Paris: Fayard.

GASCHÉ, Rodolphe. 1972. "L’Echange Héliocentrique". L’Arc, 48:70-84.

GERNET, Louis. 1982 [1951]. "Droit et Prédroit en Grèce Ancienne". In: Droit et Institution en Grèce Ancienne. Paris: Flammarion. pp. 7-119.

GODELIER, Maurice. 1996. L’Enigme du Don. Paris: Fayard.

GUIDIERI, Remo. 1984. L’Abondance des Pauvres. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

GURVITCH, Georges. e MOORE, Wilbert. 1965 [1946]. La Sociologia del Siglo XX. Barcelona: El Ateneo.

HERITIER, Françoise. 1999. "La Citadelle Imprenable". Critique, LV:61-83.

HERTZ, Robert. 1988 [1922]. Le Péchê et l’Expiation dans les Sociétés Primitives. Les Cahiers de Gradhiva 6. Paris: Jean Michel Place.

HOLLIER, Dennis. 1972. "Malaise dans la Sociologie". L’Arc, 48:55-61.

JOHANSEN, J. Prytz. 1954. The Maori and his Religion in its Non-ritualistic Aspects. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.

JUILLERAT, Bernard. 1993. "Richard Thurnwald et la Mélanesie. Réciprocités, Hiérarchies, Evolutions". Gradhiva. Revue d’Histoire et d’Archives de l’Anthropologie, 14:15-40.

KARADY, Victor. 1968. "Présentation". In: M. Mauss, Oeuvres. 1. Les Fonctions Sociales du Sacré. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

__ .1983. "The Durkheimians in Academy. A Reconsideration". In: P. Besnard (org.), The Sociological Domain. The Durkheimians and the Founding of French Sociology. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge University Press & Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme. pp. 71-89.

KUPER, Adam. 1999. Culture. The Anthropologists’ Account. Cambridge, MS: Harvard University Press.

LEACH, Edmund. 1951. "The Structural Implications of Matrilineal Cross-Cousin Marriage". Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol 81:23-55.

__ .1955. "Review of M. Mauss The Gift". Man, 55:30.

__ .1982. Social Anthropology. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

__ .1996 [1970]. Lévi-Strauss. London: Fontana Press (quarta edição)

__ .1996 [1954]. Sistemas Políticos da Alta Birmânia. São Paulo: Edusp.

LEFORT, Claude. 1967 [1951]. "A Troca e a Luta dos Homens". In: C. H. Escobar (ed.), O Método Estruturalista. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores. pp. 64-79.

LÉVI-BRHUL, Henry. 1951. "In Memoriam. Marcel Mauss". Année Sociologique, 3a Série (1948-1949).

LÉVI-STRAUSS, Claude. 1965 [1946]. "La Sociologia Francesa". In: G. Gurvitch e W. Moore (orgs.), La Sociologia del Siglo XX. Barcelona: El Ateneo. pp. 1-31.



__ .1967 [1949]. Les Structures Elémentaires de la Parenté. Paris: Mouton.

__ e D. ERIBON. 1988. De Près et de Loin. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.

__ .1991 [1950]. "Introduction à l’Oeuvre de Marcel Mauss". Sociologie et Anthropologie. Paris: PUF. pp. IX-LII.

L’ESTOILE, Benoît de. 1996. "Peut-on Aimer ses Patrons? Langage du Don, Langage du Droit et Domination Personnelle". Communication au Colloque Marcel Mauss Today, Oxford. Ms.

LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS. 1937-38; 1938-39; 1947-48. The Calendar of the LSE. London.

LOWIE, Robert. 1969 [1936]. Traité de Sociologie Primitive. Paris: Payot.



__ . 1971 [1937]. Histoire de l’Ethnologie Classique. Paris: Payot.

MALINOWSKI, Bronislaw. 1961 [1922]. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc.



__ . 1970 (1926). Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd.

__ . 1935. Coral Gardens and their Magic. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

MAUSS, Marcel. 1969. Oeuvres 3. Cohésion Sociale et Divisions de las Sociologies, vol. III. Paris: Minuit.



__ . 1991 [1923-24]. "Essai sur le Don. Forme et Raison de l’Echange dans les Sociétés Archaïques". Sociologie et Anthropologie. Paris: PUF. pp. 145-171.

__ . 1979 [1930]. "L’Oeuvre de Mauss par Lui-Même". Revue Française de Sociologie, XX(1):209-220.

MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice. 1960. "De Mauss à Lévi-Strauss". In: Signes. Paris: Gallimard.

MURPHY, Robert. 1972. Robert H. Lowie. New York: Columbia University Press.

OLIVEIRA, Roberto Cardoso de. 1979. "Introdução a uma Leitura de Mauss". In: Mauss. São Paulo: Editora Ática. pp. 7-50.

PANOFF, Michel. 1970. "Marcel Mauss’s The Gift Revisited". Man, 5(1):60-70.

PARKIN, David. 1976. "Exchanging Words". In: B. Kapferer (ed.), Transaction and Meaning. Direction in the Anthropology of Exchange and Symbolic Behaviour. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Inc. pp.163-190.



__ . 1988. "An Interview with Raymond Firth". Current Anthropology, 29(2):327-341.

PARRY, Jonathan. 1986. "The Gift, the Indian Gift and the ‘Indian Gift’". Man (N.S.)21:453-73.



__ e BLOCH, Maurice. 1995 [1989]. Money and the Morality of Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

PEIXOTO, Fernanda. 1998. "Lévi-Strauss no Brasil: A Formação do Etnólogo". Mana, Estudos de Antropologia Social, 4(1):79-107.

POUILLON, Jean e MARANDA, Pierre. 1970. Echanges et Communications. Melanges Offerts à Claude Lévi-Strauss à l’Occasion de son Anniversaire. Paris: Mouton.

SAHLINS, Marshall. 1974 [1970]. "The Spirit of the Gift". Stone Age Economics. London: Tavistock.

SIGAUD, Lygia. 1994. "Direito e Gestão de Injustiças". Antropologia Social. Comunicações do PPGAS, n. 4:139-170.

__ . 1996a "Direito e Coerção Moral no Mundo dos Engenhos". Estudos Históricos, 18:361-388.

__ . 1996b. "Apresentação". In: E. Leach (ed.), Sistemas Políticos da Alta Birmânia. São Paulo: Edusp. pp. 9-45.

__ . 1999. "Les Paysans et le Droit: Le Mode Juridique de Règlement des Conflits". Information sur les Sciences Sociales, 38(1):113-147.

TAMBIAH, Stanley J. 1993 [1984]. The Budhist Saints of the Forest and the Cult of Amulets. A Study on Charisma, Hagiography, Sectarianism, and Millennial Budhism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

VEYNE, Paul. 1976. Le Pain et le Cirque. Sociologie Historique d’un Pluralisme Politique. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

VOGT, Paul. 1983. "Obligation and Right: The Durkheimians and the Sociology of Law". In: P. Besnard (ed.), The Sociological Domain and the Founding of French School. Cambridge and Paris: Cambridge University Press/Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme. pp. 177-198.

WEBER, Max. 1986. Sociologie du Droit. Paris: PUF.

WEINER, Annete. 1992. Inalienable Possessions. The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.

 

 

Resumo



A partir dos anos 60, antropólogos de diferentes tradições nacionais passaram a convergir no sentido de considerar que o texto de Marcel Mauss, "Ensaio sobre o Dom", contivesse uma teoria da troca, que atribui à identificação entre a coisa dada e o espírito do doador o princípio de explicação das transações. Esta interpretação contrasta com a que tiveram os contemporâneos de Mauss, os quais resgataram do trabalho suas dimensões relativas ao direito, às obrigações e às prestações totais. Partindo desta constatação, o artigo problematiza o destino do ensaio e busca torná-lo inteligível. Para tanto examina as condições sociointelectuais que contribuíram para que se produzisse a inflexão na leitura e a consolidação de uma espécie de crença coletiva em relação ao trabalho. Através deste estudo de caso, a autora identifica mecanismos que operam no processo de construção de teorias, na conformação de representações acerca de textos e na sua consagração no âmbito da antropologia.

 

Abstract



From the 1960s, anthropologists of different national traditions came to share the view that Marcel Mauss’s text, "Essay on the Gift," contained a theory of exchange which takes the identification between the thing given and the spirit of the donor as the explanatory principle of transactions. This interpretation contrasts with that held by Mauss’s contemporaries, who lifted from the work aspects relating to law, obligations and total prestations. Starting from this fact, the article problematizes the essay’s fate and seeks to make it intelligible. To this end, it examines the socio-intellectual conditions which contributed to producing this inflection in the readings of the work and the consolidation of a kind of collective belief concerning it. Through this case study, the author identifies mechanisms which operate in the process of constructing theories, in the conformity found in representations of certain texts, and in the consecration of these works in the area of anthropology.

Compartilhe com seus amigos:
1   2   3


©ensaio.org 2017
enviar mensagem

    Página principal